Whorf Essay :: essays research papers

In An American Indian Model of the Universe, Whorf uses the Hopi culture as an eccentric to demonstrate that perception is determined by language. concord to Whorf, speakers of Hopi and non-speakers of Hopi can never perceive the universe the same way. Whorf believes that the Hopi culture has no general notion or intuition of era(370), referring to the absence of the word epoch in the Hopi language as well as the past, present, and future tenses in the Hopi grammar. He describes the Hopi grammar as having exactly the manifested and the manifesting(372), which roughly translates to the known and the unknown respectively. Something manifested or prey can include a past event, something that is occurring right now, as well as anything that can be grasped by the physical senses. Conversely, the subjective or the manifesting covers not only the future except also anything that is abstract or inaccessible to the physical senses, such as mentality, intellection, and emotion(372). An ything subjective in the Hopi language is associated with the verb tuntya(374), or hope. According to Whorf, the word is really a term which crystallizes the Hopi philosophy of the universe(374). It contains the combined idea of thought, desire, and cause,(374) but is at the same time associated with inanimate objects and free actions the Hopi see hope in the growing of plants, the forming of clouds and their condensation in rain and in all human hoping, wishing, striving, and fetching thought and as most especially surd in prayer(374). While it is true that the Hopi language has no word quite equivalent to our time,(375) the inwardness of time remains des enclosed spacee their not having a word to define it. If told by an elder to keep a fire going, a Hopi fireguard observe a fire pit can mentally grasp the urgency of the fire needing more wood by taking note of the color of the embers. A cowboy with a pocket watch find from a distant hill may notice the young Hopi getting up to replenish the pit with firewood every forty-five minutes. But the fireguard does not think in terms of seconds, minutes, or hours. He is merely using his observation of the embers to gauge time the same way the cowboy tells time looking at at his watch. By reading the color of the sky, or the position of the sun, a Hopi walking in the retire from will most likely know how troubled he would have to walk in order to get to a certain location out front dark.Whorf Essay essays research papers In An American Indian Model of the Universe, Whorf uses the Hopi culture as an example to demonstrate that perception is determined by language. According to Whorf, speakers of Hopi and non-speakers of Hopi can never perceive the universe the same way. Whorf believes that the Hopi culture has no general notion or intuition of time(370), referring to the absence of the word time in the Hopi language as well as the past, present, and future tenses in the Hopi grammar. He describes the Hopi grammar as having only the manifested and the manifesting(372), which roughly translates to the known and the unknown respectively. Something manifested or objective can include a past event, something that is occurring right now, as well as anything that can be grasped by the physical senses. Conversely, the subjective or the manifesting covers not only the future but also anything that is abstract or inaccessible to the physical senses, such as mentality, intellection, and emotion(372). Anything subjective in the Hopi language is associated with the verb tuntya(374), or hope. According to Whorf, the word is really a term which crystallizes the Hopi philosophy of the universe(374). It contains the combined idea of thought, desire, and cause,(374) but is at the same time associated with inanimate objects and involuntary actions the Hopi see hope in the growing of plants, the forming of clouds and their condensation in rain and in all human hoping, wishing, striving, and taking thou ght and as most especially concentrated in prayer(374). While it is true that the Hopi language has no word quite equivalent to our time,(375) the essence of time remains despite their not having a word to define it. If told by an elder to keep a fire going, a Hopi fireguard observing a fire pit can mentally grasp the urgency of the fire needing more wood by taking note of the color of the embers. A cowboy with a pocket watch observing from a distant hill may notice the young Hopi getting up to replenish the pit with firewood every forty-five minutes. But the fireguard does not think in terms of seconds, minutes, or hours. He is merely using his observation of the embers to gauge time the same way the cowboy tells time looking at his watch. By reading the color of the sky, or the position of the sun, a Hopi walking in the desert will most likely know how fast he would have to walk in order to get to a certain location before dark.